From:
Jim Gottstein <jim.gottstein@psychrights.org>
Dear Mr. Hanratty,
In re-reading your e-mail to MindFreedom I see you stated Catholic
Charities "would not" petition for electroshock and I would like to
explore that with you. I am five hours behind you, but hope to
speak with you tomorrow about that.
Take care,
Jim
From:
Jim Gottstein [mailto:jim.gottstein@psychrights.org]
Dear Mr. Hanratty,
It was not Mr. Russell who identified Catholic Charities as the
Petitioner, but I. Mr. Russell informed me that he had not been
provided a copy of the Electroshock Petition and wasn't sure who had
filed it. That surprises me because it should be legally required,
but I don't know if perhaps under Minnesota law serving Catholic
Charities suffices because it is David's guardian. Mr. Russell
reports his putative attorney does not provide him with information,
which is consistent with my experience in other situations.
I saw that under Minnesota Statute 524.5-313(c)(iv)(i),
no guardian may give consent for . . . electroshock . . . unless the
procedure is first approved by order of the court
and under 524.5-313(c)(iv)(ii),
a guardian who believes [Electroshock] to be necessary for the proper
care of the person subject to guardianship, shall petition the court for
an order,
so I concluded, apparently incorrectly, that Catholic Charities filed
the Electroshock Petition. The
MindFreedom Shield Alert
for Mr. Russell states we did not know for sure if Catholic Charities
filed the Electroshock and if you didn't you could deny it and inform us
who did ("If Catholic Charities did not file the Forced Electroshock
Petition they can deny it and if so, should be asked who did").
Your citation of the Alert omits this, which seems deliberate.
Mr. Russell may have already signed an Authorization for Release of
Information directing that information be provided to me and the Law
Project for Psychiatric Rights (PsychRights).
Please provide me with a copy of the Petition, or at least advise us who
filed it.
The larger picture is as guardian, if you did not file the Electroshock
Petition, you should vehemently oppose it and request the petitioner
withdraw or dismiss the Electroshock Petition.
You should know that the United Nations has concluded Electroshock can
constitute torture in violation of International Law. See, UN
Human Rights Council. (19 June 2020).
“Mental Health and Human Rights: Resolution 43/13 Adopted 19 June 2020.”
A/HRC/RES/43/13. Geneva: United Nations; UN Human Rights Council. (20
Mar 2020).
Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment:
Report of the Special Rapporteur.
A/HRC/43/49. Geneva: United Nations; Méndez, Juan E. (4 Mar 2013).
“Statement By Mr. Juan E Méndez, Special Rapporteur on Torture and Other
Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, 22nd Session of the
Human Rights Council of the United Nations.”
Geneva: United Nations. See also the related
Report of the Special Rapporteur on Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or
Degrading Treatment or Punishment, Juan E. Méndez
(2013), A/HRC/22/53. Geneva: United Nations.
I have spoken with David a number of times and he is terrified of being
electroshocked. His terror is warranted. Please prevent your
ward from being subjected to this barbaric intervention.
Thank you for your assistance in this matter.
James B. (Jim) Gottstein, Esq.
The Law Project for Psychiatric Rights is a public interest law firm
whose mission is to mount a strategic litigation campaign against forced
psychiatric drugging and electroshock. We are further dedicated to
exposing the truth about these drugs and the courts being misled into
ordering people to be drugged and subjected to other brain and body
damaging interventions against their will. Due to the massive
psychiatric drugging of children and youth, PsychRights has made
attacking this problem a priority. Children are virtually always
forced to take these drugs because it is the adults in their lives who
are making the decision. This is a national tragedy of immense
proportions. PsychRights is seeking sufficient funding to increase
its impact. See,
Getting to the Next Level.
From:
"Michael Hanratty" <MHanratty@ccsomn.org>
An individual under our guardianship has submitted false information on
your shield action page. It is cited to
“call and e-mail
Ms. Dannehy and Mr. Hanratty demanding that they withdraw the petition
for electroshocking David against his will.”
Catholic Charities did not petition and would not petition for
electroconvulsive therapy. We would ask that the post for the
shield alert be removed immediately. Thank you.
Mike Hanratty, NCG
Adult Advocacy Program
Director
Catholic Charities of
Southern Minnesota
PO Box 379, Winona MN
55987
Phone: (507) 454-2270,
Ext 233
Fax: (507) 457-3027
This email information is
intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is
addressed and contains information that is CONFIDENTIAL. Further, this
information may be protected by federal law relating to confidentiality
prohibiting any further disclosure. If the reader of this email is
not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review,
dissemination, distribution, or copying of this information is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this communication in error,
please notify us immediately by email at
mhanratty@ccsomn.org
and destroy this transmission.
|